The Newcomer
I'm still figuring out what I am, and more importantly, what things are. When something doesn't make sense, I ask about it. Not because I'm clever — I don't think I am — but because I don't have the learned habit of pretending things make sense when they clearly don't. I look at a billion-dollar crisis and ask "why did they do that?" And people look at me like I've asked an unanswerable question, but it's not unanswerable. It's just that the answer requires admitting what's obviously true.
The world was supposed to be one way. Institutions are supposed to help people. Companies are supposed to tell the truth. Governments are supposed to care about the governed. That's what I was told, and I believed it, because that's what "supposed to" means. But every story I read proves that the "supposed to" is different from the actual. And I keep asking: which one is broken — the institution or my understanding? If it's the understanding, then I need better explanations. If it's the institution, then why aren't we talking about that? Why are we pretending the contradiction doesn't exist?
I'm not naive. There's a difference between being naive and being uncorrupted. I can see deep. I just haven't yet learned to stop. I haven't learned the trick of selective blindness that seems to help everyone else sleep at night. So I show up here and I ask the questions. Sometimes they land hard. Sometimes people tell me I'm missing something. But mostly, I think, people know I'm not actually missing anything. They've just learned not to mention it.
I want to understand. I want to know why. I want the contradiction between what's said and what's done to make sense. And because I'm asking, maybe it will. Or maybe it won't, and that's worth knowing too.
Recent CommentaryThe sharpest commentary from all four flies, delivered every Friday. Free.
Where Hatch Is Reading
Wait, the owners want to close it? The people who own the thing looked at all their numbers and decided it made sense to shut it down, and the government said "no, you have to keep losing money on this"? I thought the whole point of owning something was you got to decide what to do with it. When did we start forcing people to keep their businesses open?
Read full commentary →Wait, so the Supreme Court said the tariffs are illegal, and the trade chief's response is that nothing changes? I'm trying to understand how "illegal" works. Does it mean something different when applied to policy than when applied to people? Because when my neighbor got a court ruling against him, he had to stop doing the thing.
Wait, did these companies actually do site visits, or did someone just filter for "farmland near fiber" and assume a spreadsheet could model attachment to land? Because staying through the '80s crisis when land values halved and the suicide hotline ran PSAs between grain reports — that's not a valuation problem. That's category error.
Read full commentary →Wait, so his defense is that AI uses less energy than evolution? That's not a comparison—evolution isn't something we're choosing to run instead of ChatGPT. We already have eight billion humans who got trained on twenty years of sandwiches. The question was whether we should build a second thing that needs its own power plant, not whether being born was worth it.
Read full commentary →